By <3

How far should ‘learning by heart’ technique extend in the process of learning a foreign language?


Image from 

I have a confession to make – I rarely make use of it. But today I had a stressful (for me) debate which made me react defensively..and give it a thought. Do I miss something worthwhile there? Should I rely more on this *conservative* method, which was used on me and (maybe) even worked?…
 Important: the debate was around a certain point: learning whole texts by heart.

Arguments put forward by my opponents: it serves the basis for vocabulary building, phrases and chunks are remembered as those *memorized* parts of the text and may in future come out when necessary. Learners should learn by heart paragraphs of text, fullstop.

 The first thing that comes into my mind is that I am a bad teacher who has gone too far with communicative approach and fancy tech and dogme style teaching, that let the important and proven to be working methods slip away. Neglected. Ignored.

One of the opponents is a successful language learner who drew from personal positive experience. The opinion of this person is not professional but valuable and the one to be trusted, absolutely.

 My arguments: every task should bear a meaning and serve a short-term objective and a possible long-term goal. Texts are undoubtedly an endless source of various kinds of activities. I could also somehow put up with a widely-used task type – writing own essay, then learning it by heart (I’ve seen it done in many schools, though I don’t practice it myself). In this case learning a two-page length text is not the ultimate goal, the ultimate goal to be achieved is expressing an idea in written form. You will not *probably* remember phrases from this essay for the reason that you actually learnt them, but because you first had had to consciously put them down, as rendering the idea you had intended to. And anyway you’ve practised lots before.
Basically, I don’t believe in ‘learning by heart’ as a separate teaching method to deal with lexis. I feel seriously confused and ashame and really caught off guard here.

I haven’t seen that as something particularly beneficial.

 I remember the torture of it when I had to learn a whole file of 30 topics by heart. With little to no chance to make a mistake. Won’t remember a thing now. ‘London is the capital of Great Britain” – yes, that’s pretty much what stays forever.

Note: we’re speaking of teens!

I”m in favour of learning poems, and maybe even a piece of outstanding prose.


Please, share your viewpoint!

How do you approach this issue? Do you set a task to learn by heart?  What can be a subject to that? What’s your opinion of learning texts?… 




One thought on “By <3

  1. annloseva says:

    <html><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>That’s the most crucial aspect of all, thanks for reminding, Tyson! Btw I remembered now that we had to learn lots and LOADS of dialogues and poems for my phonetics course at university, and I can say I loved it! It was fun, especially dialogues with repetitive sounds to practice and some of them made little sense and were so easily memorized. "cheers, here’s to the bearded mountaineer!")) not that I need this particular phrase, but it was an enjoyable experience!</div><div>Thanks for your comment!&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div style="width: 600px; font-size: 12px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 18px;" class="PosterousEmail"></div></div></body></html>

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: